Monday, June 18, 2012

Perspectives on Conducting

A recent article in the Financial Times (London based paper) about conducting was spot on. Why it is that they decided to turn their eyes on this seemingly unrelated topic I don't know but they did mention the role of the modern conductor in many aspects of an orchestras life and the fact that the mega maestros of the mid-late 20th century were built up by lucrative recording contracts which no longer exist.

I highly encourage my readers to check out the full article here.
The modern maestro - Andrew Clark

One observation by the author that I would like to expand upon is the fact that modern conductors are much less authoritative than the previous couple of generations. I had never thought about it before but the large recording contracts certainly propelled those maestros to another strata above the orchestra musicians. The introduction of money into the equation generally shifts the balance of power and when there is less money there is less power. I'm not saying this is a good thing it is just a reality.

What we often see these days, particularly in the choral community, are scrappy conductors who find the financing and make the personal sacrifices, often financial, to realize their own artistic aspirations. It is quite stunning and admirable but an incredibly hard existence and one that I can't imagine is ultimately sustainable.

On the other end of the spectrum are the larger mainstream arts organizations in which a significant portion of the staffing goes towards administrative and marketing positions that are deemed necessary to make the organizations viable. For example, the San Diego Opera, often referred to as an "A" list opera company and has operated a budget in the black for more years than I can remember; their tax statements are open to the public so feel free to fact check me on this one, but I believe that the San Diego Opera with more than 100 employees has only one full time music position!

I don't mean this as a criticism but rather an observation that a company that "makes music worth seeing" feels it is best to only have one full time musician. It simply reflects the changing nature of arts organizations and what it takes to be successful.

Back to conducting. Modern conductors have a sense of this balance shift and are more willing to play the part of the face of an organization which in turn changes their role with the orchestra. Ultimately everyone needs to be a team player and a maestro leading by example creates a more collaborative environment. I wouldn't suggest that any ensemble with someone flapping about up front is an egalitarian society but I do think that there is more of a give and take of ideas and in my mind that is a good thing.

When I am speaking to school administrators, parents, audiences and board members I try to explain that music is always a collaborative art form. It could be a collaboration between the composer and the performer, the student ant the teacher, the performers amongst themselves or between the performers and the audience. If a person sings an aria in the forest and there is no one there to hear it is it still art? Absolutely. But like life, art is more enjoyable when shared with others.

Monday, January 16, 2012

Reaching Younger Audiences

The New World Symphony is getting attention with a bold but not innovative attempt at reaching younger audiences. These days "younger" seems to be the sub 40 crowd which given the demographics of current audiences for concerts and the potential age range for these events seems like a fairly reasonable target.

The New World Symphony (the orchestra not the piece by Dvořák) is something rather remarkable in it's own right as it was started as a training orchestra for aspiring professional orchestral musicians in the 1980's. Led by artistic directory Michael Tilson Thomas and funded in part by money from the cruise ship industry the orchestra is not viewed as some extended music camp for young musicians but rather a prestigious professional level opportunity available only to those on their way up. So it comes as no surprise that this organization would go after this audience or try something bold.

The concept as reported in the Miami Herald is to create late night events with the orchestra that include cocktails and a DJ playing club music between classical sets by the young musicians. I am not opposed to later start times, cocktails, the idea of "sets" or even a DJ but I'm not a huge fan of club music. Don't get me wrong, I'm a big fan of "popular" or at least non-classical contemporary music of several different genres but club music is not really my thing.

I am willing to admit that this is likely a regional thing. I have heard of the thriving club scene on the East Coast and in Miami in particular and in college towns and urban centers in the midwest. In San Diego and in other places like New York (Brooklyn), Portland and Seattle which have a thriving alternative or indie music scenes I would imagine that alternating live sets of music might have more appeal.

At any rate, the important element is the concept. In the 20th century classical music became a very serious and reverent art form with concert halls treated like temples and concerts became worship. It is now a sin to talk or even applaud at the wrong moment and this is certainly not a social occasion. I personally appreciate that the audience is respectful and takes the art seriously, I don't appreciate it that everyone seems to take themselves seriously.

In the not so distant past and likely when the majority of the music that is performed now was written, the "classical" music experience would have been much different. The "orchestra" seats, that is the lowest level closest to the performers were the cheap seats in which the audience would come and go as they pleased and often talked. The boxes that were farther removed from the platform were the domain of the rich and often included curtains so that they might have privacy and block themselves off from the view of everyone else! Multi-movement pieces such as concertos and early symphonies were often performed separately and sometimes mismatched.

I don't advocate that we should return to quite such a climate of chaos in performances however I do think that by relaxing a bit we could include and appeal to more people. The idea of alternating sets of music with more social opportunities seems appealing. Imagine hearing a Haydn Symphony and then having the opportunity to chat with the bassoonist about the piece and then in the next set hearing a contemporary composition and then buying the composer a drink.

We need to remove the barriers and make music accessible, many are already going down this road, perhaps it will catch on before it is too late.

The full article is available here.
http://www.miamiherald.com/2012/01/15/2587959/classical-music-younger-listener.html

Tuesday, December 20, 2011

Top Five Albums of 2011

It's that time of year again so break out the eggnog and headphones and check out the lists for the top albums of the year. In all honesty I'm still digesting some of the stuff that came out in 2010 and the Autumn of 2011 saw new releases by several of my favorite artists and I probably could come up with a list of top ten albums of band that continued their legacy, that being said I decided to keep it to five albums plus some honorable mentions. I have preferred not to rank them numerically but there is an inherent value judgement in the way they appear.



Barton Hollow by the Civil Wars
This group absolutely exploded on to the scene this year. I had been hearing a buzz about this duo from Nasheville early in the year and as is common these days checked out their videos first. I was impressed with the live performances, the seriousness with which they approached their craft and yet still seeming not to take themselves too seriously which is a great combination in an artist of any genre. Barton Hollow I think was the most important album of the year receiving a lot of play in our household but of course, time will tell whether or not the Civil Wars are able to build on their success. This is also the only debut album on my list.


Helplessness Blues by Fleet Foxes
When the single for this album came out I listened to it probably 4-5 times in a row and it seemed that the wait between the release of the single and the full album was unbearable. This is a great album top to bottom and despite the direct sonic references to Simon and Garfunkle it is still a very innovative and original album.

Fleet Foxes - Helplessness Blues by subpop

Bon Iver by Bon Iver
I'm not even sure where to begin. This is another artist which I'd been hearing quite a buzz about, listened to a few tracks streaming and decided to download the new album when it came out. I listened to it a couple of times and thought that it was pretty creative but seemed like the studio indulgence of yet another single gifted songwriter. The self harmonies, guitar effects and instrumentation I heard on the record created a sonic texture that I thought would be impossible for most "pop" musicians to reproduce live... and then I came across Bon Iver live from the 930 club and I was hooked. I will be honest, I can barely make out a word or two, maybe a phrase in his songs so I don't really know what he is singing about but this music is some what like an expressionist painting, just enough detail to get the emotion but not enough detail that it couldn't be your song too.
http://www.npr.org/event/music/138890247/live-tuesday-bon-iver-in-concert


Ghosts Upon the Earth by Gungor
This is a case which happens so often in the GRAMMY's in which the artists previous work was soo good and yet unrecognized you feel like you have to give them something. In this case Gungor has produced an amazing follow up to "Beautiful Things". They once called their kind of music "Liturgical post-rock" in an attempt to distinguish themselves from other "christian" artists and they have even outgrown that. Essentially they are blurring the lines between art music and pop music and it is great, if this doesn't give you chills you might want to check your pulse.


The Whole Love by Wilco
In many ways this band ushered the folk rock sound back into the mainstream. Wilco's "Sky Blue Sky" was on repeat when I moved into my condo in 2006 in part because pretty much everyone likes their sound and each time you listen to it their is something new there for you to discover. The Whole Love makes it to the top five not because they were able to continue doing what did so well but because they were able to take a giant leap forward and still be true to themselves and their previous record. Keeping forward momentum as an artist and not alienating your fan base is perhaps the single hardest thing in pop music and these gentlemen have done it very well.




Honorable Mentions (or bands that continued to do what they do well)


The King of Limbs by Radiohead
A great Radiohead album but it seems that they have either found their stride or run out of new things to say. If you are a fan of Radiohead this is a great album, if you are a musician who is always looking to this band for a sign of things to come you might be a bit dissapointed.


 Codes and Keys by Death Cab for Cutie
You could essentially say the same thing about this album and just substitute Death Cab for Radiohead. I will say that this is a band who's sound (medium-hi audio fidelity and "produced" sound) have tastefully been updated while still retaining the same identifiable band sound. It's a great album.

The King is Dead by the Decemberists
This is a band that was ahead of it's time, perhaps well ahead of it's time and came into popularity simply by being consistent. Hailing from the mecca of hipsterdom it is hard to tell if it was the chicken or the egg that came first. I would say that I don't think it was these guys who brought the trends on however the spotlight recently focused down on their scene only helped them shine brighter. Colin is perhaps one of the best story tellers in music of my generation and it is helped that he has a good ear for catchy melodies and is backed by fun band.


Radiosurgery by New Found Glory
Full disclosure, this is my brother-in-law's band so I am a bit biased. I grew up listening to and playing this genre of music and didn't pay much attention to these guys at first because they were from a rival scene and sell outs! Pretty funny now. I will say that although this will not get the commercial attention of their albums of their early 2000's it is probably their strongest record to date while straying true to their signature sound and fan base. In many ways I would say this is culmination of some career pop punks.


Vice Verses by Switchfoot
A great follow up to Hello Huricane which in many peoples eyes put these guys back on the map. This is a great rock album. (period) It helps that the lyrics are introspective, retrospective and even selfless at times without ever being negative or condescending, very refreshing.



Standouts from 2010: So good I was still listening to them a ton in 2011
Antifogmatic - Punch Brothers (can't wait for the new record)

Beautiful Things - Gungor
The Archandroid - Janelle Monae

Please let me know what you think, albums I need to listen to or other lists I need to check out. Feel free to comment here, on my Facebook or send me a tweet.


I recommend my good friend Greg Gibson's top 10 list as well
http://www.greggibsonmusic.com/2011/12/16/happy-holidays-and-best-of-2011/

Cheers! 

Thursday, November 17, 2011

Why Music?

This address is so eloquent and powerful that I have to share it.

The original version may be found here http://www.bostonconservatory.edu/music/karl-paulnack-welcome-address

Karl Paulnack Welcome Address



One of my parents' deepest fears, I suspect, is that society would not properly value me as a musician, that I wouldn't be appreciated. I had very good grades in high school, I was good in science and math, and they imagined that as a doctor or a research chemist or an engineer, I might be more appreciated than I would be as a musician. I still remember my mother's remark when I announced my decision to apply to music school—she said, "you're wasting your SAT scores!" On some level, I think, my parents were not sure themselves what the value of music was, what its purpose was. And they loved music: they listened to classical music all the time. They just weren't really clear about its function. So let me talk about that a little bit, because we live in a society that puts music in the "arts and entertainment" section of the newspaper, and serious music, the kind your kids are about to engage in, has absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with entertainment, in fact it's the opposite of entertainment. Let me talk a little bit about music, and how it works.

One of the first cultures to articulate how music really works were the ancient Greeks. And this is going to fascinate you: the Greeks said that music and astronomy were two sides of the same coin. Astronomy was seen as the study of relationships between observable, permanent, external objects, and music was seen as the study of relationships between invisible, internal, hidden objects. Music has a way of finding the big, invisible moving pieces inside our hearts and souls and helping us figure out the position of things inside us. Let me give you some examples of how this works.
One of the most profound musical compositions of all time is the Quartet for the End of Time written by French composer Olivier Messiaen in 1940. Messiaen was 31 years old when France entered the war against Nazi Germany. He was captured by the Germans in June of 1940 and imprisoned in a prisoner-of-war camp.

He was fortunate to find a sympathetic prison guard who gave him paper and a place to compose, and fortunate to have musician colleagues in the camp, a cellist, a violinist, and a clarinetist. Messiaen wrote his quartet with these specific players in mind. It was performed in January 1941 for four thousand prisoners and guards in the prison camp. Today it is one of the most famous masterworks in the repertoire.

Given what we have since learned about life in the Nazi camps, why would anyone in his right mind waste time and energy writing or playing music? There was barely enough energy on a good day to find food and water, to avoid a beating, to stay warm, to escape torture—why would anyone bother with music? And yet—even from the concentration camps, we have poetry, we have music, we have visual art; it wasn't just this one fanatic Messiaen; many, many people created art. Why? Well, in a place where people are only focused on survival, on the bare necessities, the obvious conclusion is that art must be, somehow, essential for life. The camps were without money, without hope, without commerce, without recreation, without basic respect, but they were not without art. Art is part of survival; art is part of the human spirit, an unquenchable expression of who we are. Art is one of the ways in which we say, "I am alive, and my life has meaning."

In September of 2001 I was a resident of Manhattan. On the morning of September 12, 2001 I reached a new understanding of my art and its relationship to the world. I sat down at the piano that morning at 10 AM to practice as was my daily routine; I did it by force of habit, without thinking about it. I lifted the cover on the keyboard, and opened my music, and put my hands on the keys and took my hands off the keys. And I sat there and thought, does this even matter? Isn't this completely irrelevant? Playing the piano right now, given what happened in this city yesterday, seems silly, absurd, irreverent, pointless. Why am I here? What place has a musician in this moment in time? Who needs a piano player right now? I was completely lost.

And then I, along with the rest of New York, went through the journey of getting through that week. I did not play the piano that day, and in fact I contemplated briefly whether I would ever want to play the piano again. And then I observed how we got through the day.

At least in my neighborhood, we didn't shoot hoops or play Scrabble. We didn't play cards to pass the time, we didn't watch TV, we didn't shop, we most certainly did not go to the mall. The first organized activity that I saw in New York, on the very evening of September 11th, was singing. People sang. People sang around fire houses, people sang "We Shall Overcome". Lots of people sang America the Beautiful. The first organized public event that I remember was the Brahms Requiem, later that week, at Lincoln Center, with the New York Philharmonic. The first organized public expression of grief, our first communal response to that historic event, was a concert. That was the beginning of a sense that life might go on. The US Military secured the airspace, but recovery was led by the arts, and by music in particular, that very night.

From these two experiences, I have come to understand that music is not part of "arts and entertainment" as the newspaper section would have us believe. It's not a luxury, a lavish thing that we fund from leftovers of our budgets, not a plaything or an amusement or a pass time. Music is a basic need of human survival. Music is one of the ways we make sense of our lives, one of the ways in which we express feelings when we have no words, a way for us to understand things with our hearts when we can't with our minds.

Some of you may know Samuel Barber's heart wrenchingly beautiful piece Adagio for Strings. If you don't know it by that name, then some of you may know it as the background music which accompanied the Oliver Stone movie Platoon, a film about the Vietnam War. If you know that piece of music either way, you know it has the ability to crack your heart open like a walnut; it can make you cry over sadness you didn't know you had. Music can slip beneath our conscious reality to get at what's really going on inside us the way a good therapist does.

Very few of you have ever been to a wedding where there was absolutely no music. There might have been only a little music, there might have been some really bad music, but with few exceptions there is some music. And something very predictable happens at weddings—people get all pent up with all kinds of emotions, and then there's some musical moment where the action of the wedding stops and someone sings or plays the flute or something. And even if the music is lame, even if the quality isn't good, predictably 30 or 40 percent of the people who are going to cry at a wedding cry a couple of moments after the music starts. Why? The Greeks. Music allows us to move around those big invisible pieces of ourselves and rearrange our insides so that we can express what we feel even when we can't talk about it. Can you imagine watching Indiana Jones or Superman or Star Wars with the dialogue but no music? What is it about the music swelling up at just the right moment in ET so that all the softies in the audience start crying at exactly the same moment? I guarantee you if you showed the movie with the music stripped out, it wouldn't happen that way. The Greeks. Music is the understanding of the relationship between invisible internal objects.

I'll give you one more example, the story of the most important concert of my life. I must tell you I have played a little less than a thousand concerts in my life so far. I have played in places that I thought were important. I like playing in Carnegie Hall; I enjoyed playing in Paris; it made me very happy to please the critics in St. Petersburg. I have played for people I thought were important; music critics of major newspapers, foreign heads of state. The most important concert of my entire life took place in a nursing home in a small Midwestern town a few years ago.

I was playing with a very dear friend of mine who is a violinist. We began, as we often do, with Aaron Copland's Sonata, which was written during World War II and dedicated to a young friend of Copland's, a young pilot who was shot down during the war. Now we often talk to our audiences about the pieces we are going to play rather than providing them with written program notes. But in this case, because we began the concert with this piece, we decided to talk about the piece later in the program and to just come out and play the music without explanation.

Midway through the piece, an elderly man seated in a wheelchair near the front of the concert hall began to weep. This man, whom I later met, was clearly a soldier—even in his 70's, it was clear from his buzz-cut hair, square jaw and general demeanor that he had spent a good deal of his life in the military. I thought it a little bit odd that someone would be moved to tears by that particular movement of that particular piece, but it wasn't the first time I've heard crying in a concert and we went on with the concert and finished the piece.
When we came out to play the next piece on the program, we decided to talk about both the first and second pieces, and we described the circumstances in which the Copland was written and mentioned its dedication to a downed pilot. The man in the front of the audience became so disturbed that he had to leave the auditorium. I honestly figured that we would not see him again, but he did come backstage afterwards, tears and all, to explain himself.

What he told us was this: "During World War II, I was a pilot, and I was in an aerial combat situation where one of my team's planes was hit. I watched my friend bail out, and watched his parachute open, but the Japanese planes which had engaged us returned and machine gunned across the parachute cords so as to separate the parachute from the pilot, and I watched my friend drop away into the ocean, realizing that he was lost. I have not thought about this for many years, but during that first piece of music you played, this memory returned to me so vividly that it was as though I was reliving it. I didn't understand why this was happening, why now, but then when you came out to explain that this piece of music was written to commemorate a lost pilot, it was a little more than I could handle. How does the music do that? How did it find those feelings and those memories in me?"

Remember the Greeks: music is the study of invisible relationships between internal objects. The concert in the nursing home was the most important work I have ever done. For me to play for this old soldier and help him connect, somehow, with Aaron Copland, and to connect their memories of their lost friends, to help him remember and mourn his friend, this is my work. This is why music matters.

What follows is part of the talk I will give to this year's freshman class when I welcome them a few days from now. The responsibility I will charge your sons and daughters with is this:

"If we were a medical school, and you were here as a med student practicing appendectomies, you'd take your work very seriously because you would imagine that some night at two AM someone is going to waltz into your emergency room and you're going to have to save their life. Well, my friends, someday at 8 PM someone is going to walk into your concert hall and bring you a mind that is confused, a heart that is overwhelmed, a soul that is weary. Whether they go out whole again will depend partly on how well you do your craft.

You're not here to become an entertainer, and you don't have to sell yourself. The truth is you don't have anything to sell; being a musician isn't about dispensing a product, like selling used cars. I'm not an entertainer; I'm a lot closer to a paramedic, a firefighter, a rescue worker. You're here to become a sort of therapist for the human soul, a spiritual version of a chiropractor, physical therapist, someone who works with our insides to see if they get things to line up, to see if we can come into harmony with ourselves and be healthy and happy and well.

Frankly, ladies and gentlemen, I expect you not only to master music; I expect you to save the planet. If there is a future wave of wellness on this planet, of harmony, of peace, of an end to war, of mutual understanding, of equality, of fairness, I don't expect it will come from a government, a military force or a corporation. I no longer even expect it to come from the religions of the world, which together seem to have brought us as much war as they have peace. If there is a future of peace for humankind, if there is to be an understanding of how these invisible, internal things should fit together, I expect it will come from the artists, because that's what we do. As in the concentration camp and the evening of 9/11, the artists are the ones who might be able to help us with our internal, invisible lives."

Thursday, October 6, 2011

Breaking Charecter

Been a long time since I've posted anything and a rainy morning in San Diego seems like a perfect time to break the blog silence.

There is a hoopla or rather a grumbling in the press about the resent performance of one of today's most prominent divas at the biggest opera house in the US. Ana Netrebko is not the biggest name in opera these days, that probably goes to Rene Flemming but it is arguable that Mrs. Netrebko is the diva du jour. The Metropolitan opera is the most important opera theater in the United States and though few would argue that it is the most important theater in the world it certainly is a world focal point due to the media interest, international flavor (most other theaters have stronger national ties) and the privately raised budget which is unheard of in Europe. 

While I wasn't there and can't comment on the moment or the context I would like to just add that theater is a live event and there is an interaction between the audience and performers which exactly what makes it worth watching live over seeing it on DVD or in the movie theaters. Performers are rather perceptive, sometimes too much so, of the audience and their "vibe" and on the other side, audience members are eager to show their appreciation for the performance and often want to be involved in the process.

A choral conducting colleague of mine has often lamented the fact that local audiences are so eager to applaud that they will often start on the ultimate chord of a piece without letting the sound die out from the space or even letting the musical idea come to an end. To my point of view this is a good problem to have but in the view of my colleague they are trampling all over the artistry of the ensemble.

At any rate, this article by Zachary Woolfe gives a good overview of the situation and a history of some notable similar situations.

http://www.observer.com/2011/10/grin-and-bear-it-why-anna-netrebkos-smile-got-the-critics-riled/?show=all

Thursday, July 21, 2011

Opera fans profiled

Bookslut - a column from the website "The Smart Set" reviews a book about Opera fans or rather Fanatics.

The full review (found here) by Jess Crispin, is definitely worth the read even though it is from a personal rather than objective point of view. 

Ms. Crispin writes: In The Opera Fanatic: Ethnography of an Obsession, Claudio E. Benzecry identifies four distinct types of the obsessed attendee: There’s the hero, who believes he is keeping the opera house open and the art itself alive and vital. There’s the addict, who is willing to sacrifice his families, friends, lovers, money, and sanity to attend multiple performances of the same opera, to listen to the records and attend lectures and travel to distant theaters. There’s the nostalgic, for whom everything was better when it was sung by Maria Callas, or Joan Sutherland, or back in 1965, or back when people took pride in knowing about opera. Then there’s the pilgrim, the devoted subject who treats the opera house as a religious temple.

I guess those groups make sense enough to me but I don't identify with any of those. I wonder if those of us that wear the hats of both performer/artists and fans don't really count as fans. There is something about being on the inside of an industry that changes your status but I would say that if you are in the industry (whatever it is) and not a fan then you probably need to be doing something else.

The book, incase you are wondering: "The Opera Fanatic: the ethnography of and obsession" by Claudio E. Benzecry

Tuesday, June 14, 2011

Real life Facebook?

This add for an opera points out how odd our online lives truly are. Not the first video to do so but more tasteful than most, though I'm still not sure what the opera is about.

Enjoy